On a side note, anyone who didn’t realize that Batsy is being growly to conceal his voice is just an idiot. And I know that the video is purposefully exaggerating the situation, but I think there are some people who thought he was too growly. He wasn’t barking, his voice was just a little gruff. If anyone couldn’t understand him, they need to get their ears checked.

I do recognise the movie is flawed. it ain’t perfect. but it sure as heck don’t suck. oh, and it makes money. boo hoo. yes its richer than you or i (i use two descriptive terms because we are different people. gasp) are ever going to be. again, doesn’t mean it sucks. just means its doing well.

but, its funny though. he tries to critique the movie in one post, fails at it, and then ignores said failure by rehashing roger’s money arguements. so he’s stealing my name and roger’s arguments. huh. cute. well ill agree with you on one point: you do have issues. especially seeing as the argument you’re now using is basically a combination of tall poppy syndrome and caps lock.

Have fun in therapy, whoever the hell you are. hopefully the nice men in white jackets will help you remember your real name.

Seriously, now that I’m back to my senses, I now recognize that this movie is flawed, but okay, and I don’t need to kick people’s balls just because I’m blinded by fanboy bias that compels me to suck Joker cock. Sorry gu—aaahahahaha! No! NO! I TAKE IT ALL BACK! THERE’S NOTHING WRONG WITH THE DARK KNIGHT, BRROOOOOTHER! IF A MOVIE MAKES LOTS OF MONEY, THEN IT’S AUTOMATICALLY GOOD! BATMAN WAS PERFECTLY UNDERSTANDABLE! HE WAS JUST SPEAKING MOTORCYCLE ENGINE! AND IF ANYBODY DISAGREES WITH ME, I’LL WHINE ABOUT IT IN THIS FORUM! BRRRRROOOOTHER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!22222

…Man, I have issues. I’ll be in therapy for a while. See you in a bit, Jimmyboy. It’s been nice chatting with me.

moving on to the multitude of stupidity that was my “alter-ego’s” post…

“I’m off to troll other boards”

Take your head out of your arse and notice that since this site was created there has been arguement. It has been used for debate since july. the site’s creator obviously has no problem with that, otherwise he’d have deleted all my posts. and all the other pro-tdk posts on the site

“you can barely understand the Dark Knight”

well, a brain cell deficient neanderthal such as yourself would definitely have problems with it. Maybe if people actually tried, y’know, PAYING ATTENTION in the movie they’d understand it. but they didn’t. and apparently, that isn’t their fault. right.

“or the movie has dropped from the IMDB boards once the hype was over”

Ahem. it dropped from #1 to #3. I doubt you could really call that a significant drop. or much of a drop AT ALL. and its stayed at number three for over a month now. which would clearly indicate that once the hype died down, people still thought it was a good movie. so, once again, your wrong.

“Rachel Dawes was scarier than the joker”

Okay, to all the anti-fanboys out there: it is sometimes okay for female leads not to make you cream the moment they enter a shot. Deal with it. Though i can imagine that women WOULD terrify an under-developed unintelligent person such as yourself.

“wasted a perfectly good villain to unnecessarily pad out the movie”

Clearly, the joker was going to be the focus of the next movie. which means that two face didnt need to be kept around. And, seriously, as if an ex-DA could start his own gang. Or even survive the inevitable revenge of maroni’s men after he killed maroni. Or avoid the police after he capped the commisioner’s son and killed another officer. Theres no way that he would have survived for round three even IF batman didnt kill him.

And they didn’t waste two-face. the scarecrow, yes they probably wasted a bit, i’ll grant you that. but not two face. they told the origin story (which even some comic fans will admit is probably the best part of the two-face story), showed the effects of the jokers actions and how he could destroy even the best of men. it also rounded off the escalation theme gordon raised at the end of BB rather nicely (two-face only created because of the actions of the three heroes).

“the boat scene was incredibly cheesy”

Uh-huh. How exactly? What, demonstrating that the joker’s view of the world was inherently flawed and that he was wrong, that the good in people could sometimes overcome the evil and that sometimes civilised people wouldn’t “eat each other” under such circumstances? (if you pay attention in the interogation scene, you’ll understand what i mean). the fact he loaded the boats with explosives? Well, seeing as the city was in hysteria and eager to flee, the joker was by now loaded and had access to corrupt cops, i dont think its implausible.

Or the fact that the two boats didn’t off each other? Again, it shows that sometimes the best in people wins out. (civilians couldn’t bring themselves to murder those who had done wrong, prisoner redeemed himself and made sure that the inocents of society were spared)

“or the fact that the Joker is omniscient”

nope. just a good tactician, unpredictable, and with a large group of followers and money (and the mob and corrupt public officials).

“THE DARK KNIGHT RULZ!”

well, i guess even fools are bound to be right some of the time.

Sayonara (and use your own name ffs)

On that note…. LEEEEEIIIIIIIIIIIDBAAAAAAAAAAAG!!! Answer me, LEEEEEEEEEEEEEEIIIIIIIIIIIDBAAAAAAAAAAG!!! Talk to me, dammit! I need acknowledgement! Do you know how hard it is to talk to myself?

In any case, I’m off to troll other boards on how much Dark Knight rules despite the fact that you can barely understand the Dark Knight, or the movie has dropped from the IMDB boards once the hype was over, or the fact that Rachel Dawes was scarier than the joker, or the fact that they wasted a perfectly good villain to unnecessarily pad out the movie, or the fact that the boat scene was incredibly cheesy, or the fact that the Joker is omniscient while Batman is impotent, or… (ahem) THE DARK KNIGHT RULZ! (giggle)

the truth: posts after September 10 come from me, leidbag and Jac. all separate people. not all from me. two of the people i list above have the distinction of not being a tosser. Pick the odd one out.

so, about your above post, fleabag:
is this your attempt at satire? at mocking fanboys? is this what you need to resort to to make yourself feel better? because, y’know, clearly your not yet capable of coming up with anything resembling an intelligent reply. But identity theft?

It’s actually quite amusing. do you have self esteem issues leidbag? do you want to be me? are you jealous that some people other than yourself have evolved beyond neanderthal state? Is that it? Or are you so stupid you think that posting bs which obviously isn’t mine under my name is “witty”?

i mean, a breif summary of this arguement:

Jimmyboy & Jac: yeh, the voice is like that for a reason. didn’t suck that bad either.
Leidbag: oh no! an intelligent response! i can’t possibly think of anything to reply with! *sits there for nearly a month* ah-ha! i know what ill say!

BAWWWWW! BLABLABLABLABLA LOL

Jimmyboy & Jac: yeah, your replies don’t really make sense leidbag. and they’re stupid.

Leidbag: oh darn, they’re right…um….AH-HA! I’ll use their NAMES!

Leidbag (as jimmyboy & Jac): BAWWWWW! BLABLABLABLABLA LOL

Yeah, that’s SO witty. Tool.

Oh, one thing you did get right leidbag: the Dark Knight does rock my socks.

Fanboy 4 Life. and Proud

And the woman I touched? It wasn’t your mother. It was mine. And it was goooooooood. But that’s neither here or there.

Leidbag? Hello, leidbag? ANSWER ME, DAMMIT! Rwrwar hrefh herfrrr rrr!

…Oh, and Dark Knight rocks my socks.

Oh, no, gotta go. my mum just found about all that man porn i downloaded. sigh, better leave the basement…