Comments on: He Was Missing The Piece of Meat

By: Billy Hill

Billy Hill — Wed, 12 Nov 2008 23:53:14 +0000

3mz4r2k4mlla316s

By: Jimmyboy

Jimmyboy — Sun, 24 Aug 2008 10:41:52 +0000

@tdksucks, u have got to be joking…

“A piece of raw steak would have been more effective. Hollywood movies prove this ”

Umm…ok, batman doesn’t carry an esky or a meat cooler with him speifically for the purpose of preserving dog meat. It would be moronic if he did (less mobility). like, what r the odds that he’ll encounter dogs (other then the chechen)? in a crusade against drugs dealers and gangsters, etc, dogs probably aren’t on his mind. He’s not going to be dumb enuf to waste belt space on meat coolers for doogie food. In the adam west version, yes. TDK, i think not.

By: thekilleroftime

thekilleroftime — Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:03:06 +0000

Batman didn’t kick the Joker off of him, because he needed to get him to tell him where the master detonator for the boats were, that and they had to wrap up their story/ belief in people and the goooooooodness that exist in all people when the chips are down lol.

I am a fan of this movie – truly. I see all of its warts, moles, and cellulite – and still love it.

By: JM

JM — Sat, 26 Jul 2008 18:26:39 +0000

Actually dogs would be more dangerous opponents than humans. Rotweilers have vice-like grips with their jaws, and are fast. Every see a human chase down a dog? Ever see a dog chase down a human?

If the dogs were trained properly, a piece of meat would be ineffective. If it worked with say police dogs than why don’t criminals carry around pieces of meat with them?

By: roger

roger — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 19:10:29 +0000

piece of shit.
why argue dogs.
it was just dumb.
it was like rascal flatts and six flags combined and then painted black.
i’d like to see what chan-wook park or someone like that could do with the batman.

By: Tranzl8

Tranzl8 — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:42:59 +0000

OMG quad r u kidding me. Can’t u see the humor in it? He’s not totally serious. Just makin his point w/ humor. Laughin my ass off on the writeups here. I don’t agree with all of them but the pages are hella funny.

By: quad

quad — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:29:02 +0000

lolz
u think he shud have carried meat all the time… so that wen any dog attacks he can use it…
how r u so sure that it will help! i mean some dogs are faithful enough to attack ANY intruder afterall Batman is no Tom n Jerry…

this post wud have been quite meaningful against dogs in cartoons like tom and jerry

too immature a post…. if u think thedarkknightsucks.com is a featured blog

By: Featured Blog of the Week: The Dark Knight Sucks.com | Voize

Featured Blog of the Week: The Dark Knight Sucks.com | Voize — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:59:55 +0000

[...] He Was Missing The Piece of Meat [...]

By: tdksucks

tdksucks — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 23:58:42 +0000

“1) He faced dogs at the start of the film, and one bit through the old suit, gashing his side quite bad. The old suit DID NOT protect from dogs that well.”

A piece of raw steak would have been more effective. Hollywood movies prove this

By: Dooby

Dooby — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 23:51:03 +0000

This is my first post I’ve read on this site, and you’re already so far off the mark that I doubt I’ll continue reading. The newer Batsuit DID help with the dogs, and not knives. Here’s the rundown why, for those who didn’t really watch the film (the author, apparently).

1) He faced dogs at the start of the film, and one bit through the old suit, gashing his side quite bad. The old suit DID NOT protect from dogs that well.

2) He hadn’t faced Joker when the new suit was made, and who would have thought that any one WOULD use knives to fight (he’d been fighting the mob so far, known for their use of GUNS).

3) The Joker WAS NOT a scrawny white guy. He was quick thinking (helps A LOT in fights), nimble, and strong. He took the big henchman out at the meeting super quick.

He did know about the dogs on the top floor, it showed them at the time. He knocked one away, and fought with the other two, and then got knocked over by the Joker. He kicked the Joker off, then dispatched the two dogs quickly, and without hurt.

He had just fought his way up a building, against not only the mob, but the cops as well. Batman ISN’T a superhero, the suit isn’t super strong, and he didn’t WANT to kill the Joker (his own code, which was referred to all the way through the film). He treated him with “some” kid gloves, and won out in the end.

Not one of your main points actually occurred or is justified properly. Thanks for sharing your thoughts though.