<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pick One: Realistic or Idealistic?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedarkknightsucks.com/2008/07/22/pick-one-realistic-or-idealistic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedarkknightsucks.com/2008/07/22/pick-one-realistic-or-idealistic/</link>
	<description>Why so delirious?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 12:14:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: joker_gat_talent</title>
		<link>http://www.thedarkknightsucks.com/2008/07/22/pick-one-realistic-or-idealistic/comment-page-1/#comment-557</link>
		<dc:creator>joker_gat_talent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 07:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedarkknightsucks.wordpress.com/?p=120#comment-557</guid>
		<description>Yes!! thumbs up for the man who made us laugh,people should be ashamed for criticizing the dark knight.The movie is ok ,what ever one can say i don&#039;t care i have seen it 4 times now.

who ever don&#039;t understand the theme of the movie,they should just give up.because neither one of the boats blew up was to show that not all the people are about blowing things up.

and why two face was no longer the same is to show that people should not always prioritize by choosing to save women,that is why the joker swapped the addresses of were they are.

why so serious,its not all about the money that why the joker burned all the money.its about the plan people.even though
something is bad but if its according to the plan its good.

we are also taught not to want to be in control of everything.

well again there are so many mistakes on the movies,but its not important now,so i ll watch it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes!! thumbs up for the man who made us laugh,people should be ashamed for criticizing the dark knight.The movie is ok ,what ever one can say i don&#8217;t care i have seen it 4 times now.</p>
<p>who ever don&#8217;t understand the theme of the movie,they should just give up.because neither one of the boats blew up was to show that not all the people are about blowing things up.</p>
<p>and why two face was no longer the same is to show that people should not always prioritize by choosing to save women,that is why the joker swapped the addresses of were they are.</p>
<p>why so serious,its not all about the money that why the joker burned all the money.its about the plan people.even though<br />
something is bad but if its according to the plan its good.</p>
<p>we are also taught not to want to be in control of everything.</p>
<p>well again there are so many mistakes on the movies,but its not important now,so i ll watch it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seraphina</title>
		<link>http://www.thedarkknightsucks.com/2008/07/22/pick-one-realistic-or-idealistic/comment-page-1/#comment-556</link>
		<dc:creator>Seraphina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 17:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedarkknightsucks.wordpress.com/?p=120#comment-556</guid>
		<description>Just like to second the opinion that the Milgram Experiment was wrongly referenced (i&#039;m also a psych student, you&#039;ll have to forgive us, we&#039;re anally retentive about this stuff.)

I wont repeat what Uno has said, because it&#039;s unnecessary, but basically it was an inappropriate allusion because of the things Uno pointed out plus the fact that two different things were being tested; Milgram was testing obedience under certain conditions and found that it is only present under very specific conditions. the Joker was testing survival instinct and the willingness to sacrifice a hell of a lot of other lives for your own.  even if the result had turned out to be the same, they arnt cmparable studies.

Also, you will tend to find anyone but the most sadistic/psychotic/sociopathic people will shy away from killng a lot of other people who are within eye sight.

also, we all know films often carry messages; about society, government, poeple, emotions, you know. there was a message there about how even in depraved places like Gotham City poeple still have a flicker of humanity; thats why it was the criminals who went so far as to throw the detonator out of the boat; to hammer a point home. maybe its not what would have happened in real life, maybe it is; depends whos on the boat.

and that leads me to my final point; it wasnt real life. it was a film. go mutter about the inaccuracy and unrealistic nature of The Simpsons or something....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just like to second the opinion that the Milgram Experiment was wrongly referenced (i&#8217;m also a psych student, you&#8217;ll have to forgive us, we&#8217;re anally retentive about this stuff.)</p>
<p>I wont repeat what Uno has said, because it&#8217;s unnecessary, but basically it was an inappropriate allusion because of the things Uno pointed out plus the fact that two different things were being tested; Milgram was testing obedience under certain conditions and found that it is only present under very specific conditions. the Joker was testing survival instinct and the willingness to sacrifice a hell of a lot of other lives for your own.  even if the result had turned out to be the same, they arnt cmparable studies.</p>
<p>Also, you will tend to find anyone but the most sadistic/psychotic/sociopathic people will shy away from killng a lot of other people who are within eye sight.</p>
<p>also, we all know films often carry messages; about society, government, poeple, emotions, you know. there was a message there about how even in depraved places like Gotham City poeple still have a flicker of humanity; thats why it was the criminals who went so far as to throw the detonator out of the boat; to hammer a point home. maybe its not what would have happened in real life, maybe it is; depends whos on the boat.</p>
<p>and that leads me to my final point; it wasnt real life. it was a film. go mutter about the inaccuracy and unrealistic nature of The Simpsons or something&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uno</title>
		<link>http://www.thedarkknightsucks.com/2008/07/22/pick-one-realistic-or-idealistic/comment-page-1/#comment-555</link>
		<dc:creator>Uno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 03:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedarkknightsucks.wordpress.com/?p=120#comment-555</guid>
		<description>Ok, I&#039;ve browsed the hating of the film with nothing more than mild amusement, but as a psychologist, I have to call out the blatant misuse of the Milgram experiment.

Firstly, Milgram performed over a dozen different versions of his test and almost all of the findings completely disassociate this situation from that.

He showed that the effect only works if an authority figure is present, physically, the Joker was not.  He showed that the effect only works if the authority figure was legitimate and respected, the Joker was not.  He showed that it only worked if the situation was at least slightly ambiguous, and blowing up a ferry is most certainly not.

A large part of the discussion within psychology regarding the Milgram experiment (and trust me, by the end of your first year you are pretty sure you can not discuss it for another second) relates to the fact that the participants had a kind of plausible deniability in their own minds, and that when you take that away, the effect all but dissappears.

Plus, if they -did- believe it, the participants of the Milgram study only believed themselves to be harming or killing one person.  Not pressing a button which meant certain death for a ferry load of people.

Finally, and perhaps most importantly, is the concept of gradual commitment.  The shock levels in Milgram&#039;s experiment increased by 15volts at a time, and after you have agreed to 15 volts, and then 30, it is hard to decide to draw a line before 45, or 60.  It is very, very different to going from 0-blow up a ferry in one step, don&#039;t you think?

Have a pleasant day,

Uno</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I&#8217;ve browsed the hating of the film with nothing more than mild amusement, but as a psychologist, I have to call out the blatant misuse of the Milgram experiment.</p>
<p>Firstly, Milgram performed over a dozen different versions of his test and almost all of the findings completely disassociate this situation from that.</p>
<p>He showed that the effect only works if an authority figure is present, physically, the Joker was not.  He showed that the effect only works if the authority figure was legitimate and respected, the Joker was not.  He showed that it only worked if the situation was at least slightly ambiguous, and blowing up a ferry is most certainly not.</p>
<p>A large part of the discussion within psychology regarding the Milgram experiment (and trust me, by the end of your first year you are pretty sure you can not discuss it for another second) relates to the fact that the participants had a kind of plausible deniability in their own minds, and that when you take that away, the effect all but dissappears.</p>
<p>Plus, if they -did- believe it, the participants of the Milgram study only believed themselves to be harming or killing one person.  Not pressing a button which meant certain death for a ferry load of people.</p>
<p>Finally, and perhaps most importantly, is the concept of gradual commitment.  The shock levels in Milgram&#8217;s experiment increased by 15volts at a time, and after you have agreed to 15 volts, and then 30, it is hard to decide to draw a line before 45, or 60.  It is very, very different to going from 0-blow up a ferry in one step, don&#8217;t you think?</p>
<p>Have a pleasant day,</p>
<p>Uno</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: avantsweater</title>
		<link>http://www.thedarkknightsucks.com/2008/07/22/pick-one-realistic-or-idealistic/comment-page-1/#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>avantsweater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedarkknightsucks.wordpress.com/?p=120#comment-554</guid>
		<description>Yeah I believed the phone thing but Joker was like FIVE steps ahead of everyone at all times. I thought it was kind of obnoxious. He should have just killed more people and planned less things. Maybe bought more dogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I believed the phone thing but Joker was like FIVE steps ahead of everyone at all times. I thought it was kind of obnoxious. He should have just killed more people and planned less things. Maybe bought more dogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethereal Magnanimus</title>
		<link>http://www.thedarkknightsucks.com/2008/07/22/pick-one-realistic-or-idealistic/comment-page-1/#comment-553</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethereal Magnanimus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedarkknightsucks.wordpress.com/?p=120#comment-553</guid>
		<description>Joker did seem pretty omniscient, but that is to be expected. If he wasn&#039;t one step ahead of Batman, the movie would have been about someone who was (the Riddler, perhaps).

Most cell phones have both speakers and microphones, so the concept of sonar, while a stretch, seems semi-plausible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joker did seem pretty omniscient, but that is to be expected. If he wasn&#8217;t one step ahead of Batman, the movie would have been about someone who was (the Riddler, perhaps).</p>
<p>Most cell phones have both speakers and microphones, so the concept of sonar, while a stretch, seems semi-plausible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craig</title>
		<link>http://www.thedarkknightsucks.com/2008/07/22/pick-one-realistic-or-idealistic/comment-page-1/#comment-552</link>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedarkknightsucks.wordpress.com/?p=120#comment-552</guid>
		<description>that cell sonar seemed to make situations more complicated.

89 batman seemed like a realistic movie to me.  with the exception of a utility belt pulling someone up. but hey I can buy that much for a movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that cell sonar seemed to make situations more complicated.</p>
<p>89 batman seemed like a realistic movie to me.  with the exception of a utility belt pulling someone up. but hey I can buy that much for a movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: avantsweater</title>
		<link>http://www.thedarkknightsucks.com/2008/07/22/pick-one-realistic-or-idealistic/comment-page-1/#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>avantsweater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedarkknightsucks.wordpress.com/?p=120#comment-551</guid>
		<description>So the ultimate thing is that the Joker doesn&#039;t even follow his own rules of &quot;no rules/anarchy/I do whatever at any given time&quot; and meticulously plans every detail down to the minutia?

He did know it was prisoners and regular people though on the boats I think also.

He just seemed totally omniscient and Batman seemed like a dumbass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the ultimate thing is that the Joker doesn&#8217;t even follow his own rules of &#8220;no rules/anarchy/I do whatever at any given time&#8221; and meticulously plans every detail down to the minutia?</p>
<p>He did know it was prisoners and regular people though on the boats I think also.</p>
<p>He just seemed totally omniscient and Batman seemed like a dumbass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wrong Realism</title>
		<link>http://www.thedarkknightsucks.com/2008/07/22/pick-one-realistic-or-idealistic/comment-page-1/#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>Wrong Realism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedarkknightsucks.wordpress.com/?p=120#comment-550</guid>
		<description>The point of the movie was not to be physically realistic and was never stated as such.

The point was to be SOCIALLY and MENTALLY realistic, as in the situations, emotional responses, mob mentality, and personal morality battles were down to earth and realistic rather then, &quot;He is the good guy everyone likes him&quot; mentality.

If Nolan wanted a physically realistic movie this movie would&#039;ve sucked for a lot of reasons

no tumbler
no gadgets
no skyhook
no sonar
no two-face
no truck flipping
no bat-pod up the wall turn around
etc.
etc.
etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point of the movie was not to be physically realistic and was never stated as such.</p>
<p>The point was to be SOCIALLY and MENTALLY realistic, as in the situations, emotional responses, mob mentality, and personal morality battles were down to earth and realistic rather then, &#8220;He is the good guy everyone likes him&#8221; mentality.</p>
<p>If Nolan wanted a physically realistic movie this movie would&#8217;ve sucked for a lot of reasons</p>
<p>no tumbler<br />
no gadgets<br />
no skyhook<br />
no sonar<br />
no two-face<br />
no truck flipping<br />
no bat-pod up the wall turn around<br />
etc.<br />
etc.<br />
etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tdksucks</title>
		<link>http://www.thedarkknightsucks.com/2008/07/22/pick-one-realistic-or-idealistic/comment-page-1/#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator>tdksucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedarkknightsucks.wordpress.com/?p=120#comment-549</guid>
		<description>Ethereal Magnanimus, the &quot;sonic booms&quot; thing is fair enough (in regards to suspension of disbelief) and somewhere here I have mentioned that even in movies intended to be &quot;realistic&quot; (or should I say focused on realism), the suspension of disbelief is necessary otherwise the movie can&#039;t be enjoyed.  I think the main gripes here (the overall issues, not just this particular one) is that either the movie&#039;s message contradicts itself or the attempt at realism is completely destroyed by things like sci-fi mass-sonar cell phones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ethereal Magnanimus, the &#8220;sonic booms&#8221; thing is fair enough (in regards to suspension of disbelief) and somewhere here I have mentioned that even in movies intended to be &#8220;realistic&#8221; (or should I say focused on realism), the suspension of disbelief is necessary otherwise the movie can&#8217;t be enjoyed.  I think the main gripes here (the overall issues, not just this particular one) is that either the movie&#8217;s message contradicts itself or the attempt at realism is completely destroyed by things like sci-fi mass-sonar cell phones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethereal Magnanimus</title>
		<link>http://www.thedarkknightsucks.com/2008/07/22/pick-one-realistic-or-idealistic/comment-page-1/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethereal Magnanimus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedarkknightsucks.wordpress.com/?p=120#comment-548</guid>
		<description>:) i forgot to finish that last thought.

The concept of sonic booms not existing is just my way of saying that, because the setting requires a sense of disbelief, certain laws of physics and probability need to be suspended for the characters to live up to their names.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://www.thedarkknightsucks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  i forgot to finish that last thought.</p>
<p>The concept of sonic booms not existing is just my way of saying that, because the setting requires a sense of disbelief, certain laws of physics and probability need to be suspended for the characters to live up to their names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
